Youre not logged in ... Login
menu
landsharkbicycles
|
Friday, 10. October 2003
landshark October 10, 2003 at 3:26:45 PM CESTTopic: times remake is mothafuckin? I love Psychos... "Eberwein and Greenberg feel that there is something paradoxical about the remake. Its production often is perceived as an aggression against the older film, as an attempt to replace the older, to make it forgotten by the new success. For only the success can erase the original. "It seems to be that it is the essential of success to get further than the father and that it still is forbidden to wish to surpass the father." Sigmund Freud's remark on success leads right away to the oedipal complex. Eberwein and Greenberg follow this pattern. But if the remaker is the son and the filmmaker of the original is the father, who is the mother? It cannot be the remake, because it is the product and not the companion of the father. The remake rather stands for the taboo that is broken by the wish to have the same or even more success than the father by ? naturally ? using the same means. In fact, the mother cannot be anything but the audience. It is clearly the female part in the story, because it has this strange active passivity psychoanalysis certifies women since Freud at the very latest. In one word, Eberwein and Greenberg implicitly say that the remaker is a motherfucker." Eigentlich ein ziemlich groovy Artikel, aber an der Stelle konnt ich nicht annerster. ... comment
|
Online for 8532 days
Last update: 1/11/17, 2:56 PM recent updates
search
calendar
|